New
Releases |
December 20, 2024
|
December 13, 2024
|
December 6, 2024
|
November 29, 2024
|
November 22, 2024
|
November 15, 2024
|
November 8, 2024
|
November 1, 2024
|
October 25, 2024
|
October 18, 2024
|
|
|
2010 NFL Preview
Article by
Zach Saltz
Posted - 8/19/10
The 2010 NFL
season commences Thursday, September 9, with a rematch of
the NFC Championship game, Saints vs. Vikings.
The Thursday kick-off game has
traditionally been low-scoring and snooze-tastic, and you’d
have to be a real idiot not to pick the Saints, Favre or no
Favre.
Never bet against a reigning
Super Bowl champion in its opener; the last time one such
team lost in its first game of the season was the Brian
Griese-led 1999 Denver Broncos.
Hell, even Charlie Batch won
the 2006 opener for the Steelers.
Speaking of
Pittsburgh and their backups, the Three Year Cycle theory
with the Steelers must be considered for 2010.
For those of you not familiar
with this nearly flawless theory, it maintains that every
three years Pittsburgh boasts a team that is better than
everyone realizes but loses in the playoffs (2007, 2004, and
2001), a lousy team that misses the playoffs (2009, 2006,
and 2003) and a Super Bowl winning team that isn’t actually
all that good (2008, 2005, and 2002 – OK, they didn’t
technically win the Super Bowl in 2002, but if Tommy Maddox
had beaten the Titans in Round Two, watch out).
If that theory holds in 2010,
we should expect a double-digit win tally with a quick
playoff exit.
But I say that
this Cycle comes to an end in 2010.
After all, we are beginning a
new decade, right?
Time to forget about the two
worst years of the 2000s (2005 and 2008) when the Steelers
“won” Super Bowls.
In fact, I wouldn’t be terribly
surprised if
Pittsburgh
finished last in the AFC North –
Cincinnati
is defending the division title,
Baltimore
is my Super Bowl pick out of the AFC, and
Cleveland
looked brilliant in its final four games of last year.
Really, the North
division provides the only true drama in the AFC because the
other three divisions will be won by teams that haven’t been
displaced from the top in six years – the Patriots, Colts,
and Chargers.
For the Patriots and especially
the Chargers, it’s a matter of the schedule.
In its first ten games, San Diego
plays a whopping two playoff teams from 2009 – the Cardinals
and the Patriots – and both are home games.
Their only other noteworthy
games are at Indy (where they haven’t lost in six years) and
at Cincinnati
(a December game, the month in which Philip Rivers has never
lost a game).
This team could be led by Dan
Orlovsky and still win the division.
In fact, even predicting four
losses is hard for me to do.
But then I remember that San Diego
annually has an over/under of 2.5 stupid losses in the first
eight weeks of the season (my money this year is on Seattle
and Houston).
And they couldn’t win a playoff
game to save their lives.
Then there’s the
Patriots.
Tom Brady didn’t throw 50
touchdowns last year, but statistically, he was almost as
magnificent as 2007 because he consistently played against
quality pass defenses (in 2009, the Pats played the top
three pass defenses – New York, Buffalo, and Denver – a
total of five games, and Brady went 3-2).
With a healthy Welker back in
the lineup and Moss and Brady in the last years of their
contracts, I imagine them
excelling down the stretch, and
their toughest non-division opponents (Cincinnati,
Baltimore, Minnesota Indianapolis, Green Bay) are all home
games (remember that the Pats went 8-0 at
Foxboro last year).
So what about the
Pats’ AFC East rival everyone is talking about?
Sorry Buffalo
fans, I’m talking about the New York J-E-T-S Jets Jets Jets.
Somehow, I don’t see it
happening.
The Revis holdout is bad news,
and at this point in his career, LT is dead weight.
The underlying issue though:
Just as Major League Baseball has again swung to being a
pitcher’s sport, the NFL is an offensive game, and I don’t
think Mark Sanchez can be a blue-chip quarterback.
I didn’t think he was talented
at USC, and everyone seems to forget that prior to the Jets’
playoff run last year (spearheaded by their defense, not
their offense), Sanchez sucked.
The guy completed 50 percent of
his passes and had a quarterback rating of 63.
Even if he suddenly pulls a Rex
Grossman, I would never trust him.
I do like the
Dolphins, however.
Don’t ask me why, but I do.
Henne is a playmaker, Ginn is
exceptional, Marshall
is a great addition, and they’re the only team that does the
Wildcat effectively.
Plus, their final three home
games in December are against
Cleveland,
Buffalo,
and
Detroit.
They’re flying under the radar,
which is nice, and always seem to take one from the Pats
each year.
Pencil them in as a wildcard
team.
The Colts will
win the AFC South again, but by default.
They’re like the token Harvey
Weinstein Best Picture nominee.
How last season’s team won 14
games is mind-boggling, as was why so many people thought
they would win the Super Bowl.
Actually, it’s not
mind-boggling – it’s because you simply can’t bet against
Peyton Manning.
Indianapolis
won seven games last year by four points or less.
The 2008 and 2009 Colts squads
are the only two teams to rush for fewer than 1,300 yards in
a season and have a winning record (let alone, win 23 games
in a row).
You think Mark Sanchez could do
that?
They play a total five games in
prime time this season, including Manning Bowl II.
I like Houston as
the other wildcard.
Kind of an AFC version of the
2008 Arizona Cardinals – bad history, prolific passing
offense, no real defense, everyone’s favorite “sleeper” pick
the last five years.
They won’t beat the Colts, but
with Slaton back healthy and a suddenly spry defense, with
two rookies of the year (Cushing and Ryans) and a number one
pick finally starting to prove himself (Mario Williams),
this team would be a solid contender in any other division
than the AFC South.
I like them for the exact
reason I don’t like the Jets – their passing game makes them
a threat to anyone.
But the team I
like most in the AFC is Baltimore.
Yes, lots of people are picking
them, and no, it wouldn’t surprise me if they lose to the
eventual AFC Champ in the playoffs (exactly what they’ve
done in their last three playoff appearances).
They have a rough schedule
(their first four away games are all against playoff teams).
But under Project Flacco, the
offense has been getting better with each season, and the
addition of Anquan Boldin could produce (gulp) a 4,000-yard
passing season for the Ravens.
Ray Rice is explosive, although
it should be noted that the last Baltimore Raven to lead the
team in rushing for consecutive years was Jamal Lewis in
’05-’06.
Last
year’s team kept losing games they should have won, and
could have easily been a 12-win team with a made field goal
or one incomplete pass.
This year’s team should excel
on all fronts, but it’s not as though we didn’t hear the
same kind of rhetoric last year at this time.
Division Champions
New England 11-5
Baltimore 12-4
Indianapolis 11-5
San Diego 12-4
Wild Card Teams
Miami 10-6
Houston 9-7
Round One
Houston over Indianapolis
New England over Miami
Round Two
Baltimore over Houston
New England over San Diego
AFC Championship
Baltimore over New England
The NFC is the
conference I like a little less, and boasts teams I dislike
for the most part (Dallas and Minnesota being the biggest
culprits).
I think neither team will have
the same success they had in 2009.
As usual, Dallas has as many
nationally-televised games than LeBron James ESPN specials
(a ridiculous six games), but people forget that the
“prolific” Tony Romo/Miles Austin offense failed to score
more than 24 points in a single game after November 1, and
could only manage a field goal in their playoff humiliation
in Minnesota.
Their “all-star” defense only
picked off 11 passes all season (and forced only 21
turnovers, fifth worst in the league and fewer than
Detroit
and
Seattle).
They play in arguably in
toughest division in football, and cannot beat up on the
Redskins any longer.
I think we’re ripe for yet
another “this team deserves better than Wade Phillips”
season.
As for the
Vikings, Favre playing or not playing makes an obvious
difference.
But not as big of one as most
people would forecast.
Last season’s success was a bit
of a fluke – Minnesota played only beat one quality opponent
on the road (Green Bay, of course) and didn’t win an away
game after November 1.
Their corners are average at
best, and though Adrian Peterson had 18 touchdowns last
season, he only had three 100-yard rushing games.
They do have a nice string of
three straight manageable home games in December, but like
the other purple-colored NFL team, Baltimore, their first
four away games are against playoff teams.
If Favre is still recovering
from his ankle injury, early victories may be hard to come
by.
My two favorite
teams in the NFC for 2010 are Green Bay and New Orleans.
Lots of people like the
Packers, and it’s easy to see why: Exceptional quarterback,
tough, unique defense, and excellent ball-handling.
I always tell people Rodgers
reminds me of a young Steve Young, both athletically and
with all the personnel issues he’s gone through.
He gets sacked a ton, but
rarely turns the ball over.
The only issue with the Packers
(besides the ghost of Favre): Close games.
They simply are not clutch.
In 2008, it bordered on the
ridiculous, with seven losses coming by four points or
fewer.
They improved in 2009, but
still faltered in their epic playoff game in Arizona.
These are the same struggles
Young, Favre, and Peyton Manning experienced early in their
careers, and I’m convinced Rodgers can move beyond them.
I like the
Saints, although no team has ever won consecutive NFC South
titles (and the last NFC team to win back-to-back Super
Bowls was the ’92-’93 Cowboys).
Virtually their entire team
comes back intact, their impossible to beat at home, and any
belief that the franchise is “cursed” has been thankfully
put to rest.
Their schedule isn’t too rough
– only two playoff teams in the first 10 weeks, and home
matchups with
Cleveland,
Seattle,
and St. Louis.
Their Thanksgiving Day game at
Dallas
could be the first watchable Thanksgiving game in decades.
Carolina
has their strong running game, but Matt Moore still needs to
develop, and I question whether
Atlanta
is as much a contender as everyone else seems to annually
believe.
As for the rest
of the conference?
Something is telling me to pick
the Giants in the NFC East.
They’re the type of team that
responds well to doubt – no one thought they could win the
division in ’05, no one thought they could win the Super
Bowl in ’07, and lots of people think they’re washed-up
after witnessing the disaster of their last four games in
’09. Manning statistically had his best season last year,
and they’re just enough under-the-radar to forget about.
I like the Redskins, too, and
believe they’re a team just nutty enough to make the
headlines every week with team antics and wins.
The Kolb-era Eagles have 8-8
written all over them.
And then there’s
the NFC West, which is so weak, a team that hasn’t made the
playoffs in eight years is expected to win it.
Am I on the 49ers bandwagon?
I was in ’06 and ’07, and they
disappointed me.
Their only wins against a team
with a winning record last season were their two victories
over Arizona
(a team they’ve owned over the past few seasons).
Seattle
and St.
Louis are out of the
question, which leaves
Arizona
. . . a team that has been dominated by
San Francisco.
So yes, I like the 49ers.
And if that sounds familiar, so
is my claim that
Seattle
will suck.
That’s all for my
NFL predictions.
Here are a few other random
thoughts: TO won’t eclipse 1,000 yards and 8 touchdowns
receiving . . . Chris Johnson won’t be as explosive as his
historic 2009 campaign, but will still manage 1,500 yards
rushing . . . Kansas City and Cleveland will improve by 3-4
games and be legitimate threats in their division, if not
for a little while . . . Atlanta, Denver, and Jacksonville
will win 3-4 fewer games than they did last year . . .
Rodgers will be MVP . . . Over/under on bonehead remarks
made by Chris Collinsworth per game: 7.5.
Division Champions
New York 11-5
Green Bay 13-3
New Orleans 13-3
San Francisco 10-6
Wild Card
Washington 10-6
Minnesota 9-7
Round One
Minnesota over New York
Washington over San Francisco
Round Two
Green Bay over Washington
New Orleans over Minnesota
NFC Championship
Green Bay over New Orleans
Super Bowl XLV
Baltimore over Green Bay
|
New
Reviews |
Podcast Featured Review |
Podcast Review - Terry |
Christmas Watch
Podcast Review - Zach |
20th Anniversary
Podcast Oscar Review - Terry |
20th Anniversary
Podcast Trivia Review - Terry |
Ford Explorer Watch
Podcast Review - Adam |
300TH EPISODE
PODCAST DEEP DIVE |
Podcast Featured Review |
Podcast Review - Terry |
Ford Explorer Watch
Podcast Review - Adam |
Podcast Review - Zach |
Junior Jr. Watch
Podcast Ribisi Review - Todd |
30th Anniversary
Podcast Oscar Review - Terry |
30th Anniversary Christmas
PODCAST DEEP DIVE |
Podcast Featured Review |
Podcast Review - Terry & Todd |
20th Anniversary
Podcast Oscar Review - Terry |
Junior Jr. Watch
Podcast Ribisi Review - Todd |
Podcast Review - Zach |
Podcast Featured Review |
Podcast Featured Review |
Podcast Featured Review |
Podcast Featured Review |
Podcast Review - Zach |
Podcast Trivia Review - Zach |
Podcast Trivia Review - Todd |
10th Anniversary
Podcast Oscar Review - Terry |
Junior Jr. Watch
Podcast Ribisi Review - Todd |
|
|