New
Releases |
November 8, 2024
|
November 1, 2024
|
October 25, 2024
|
October 18, 2024
|
October 11, 2024
|
October 4, 2024
|
September 27, 2024
|
September 20, 2024
|
September 13, 2024
|
September 6, 2024
|
|
|
Inception
(2010)
Directed by
Christopher Nolan
Review by
Todd Plucknett
Posted - 7/20/10
I must say that I have never seen anything quite
like Christopher Nolan’s
Inception. It is a dream that will challenge the audience to think
deeper than most other blockbuster films. It has shades of
The Matrix and other sci-fi
mind-benders. Its ideas are intoxicating at times. It is a complete and
astonishing world that Nolan has invented, and it is a trip that is
worth getting lost in for two and a half hours.
I will not go into the plot too much. So much of
the pleasure in watching this film is trying to piece together this
complex puzzle, finding out what exactly is going on and if what we are
seeing is reality or a dream. The principle characters work for a
company that induces dreams in people, most of the time hired by
corporations in attempt to extract information from the subject’s
subconscious. Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a man grieving the death of
his wife Mal (Oscar-winner Marion Cotillard), who died in the limbo
state of a dream years before. He is trying to return home to the
States, but they believe that he murdered her. With the help of his
team, including “point man” Arthur (Joseph-Gordon-Levitt), the college
“dream architect” Ariadne (Ellen Page), and Eames (Tom Hardy), the group
embarks on a mission to help Saito (Ken Watanabe), a billionaire who is
trying to take down a rival company led by Maurice Fischer (Pete
Postlethwaite), who has recently died and left his business to his son
Robert (Cillian Murphy). They invade Robert’s mind in attempt to find
secrets to taking down his own business. In exchange, Saito will help
Cobb get back into the country with his connections.
Ok, that is about as well as I can explain the
plot. I assume that so much of the wonder is going to need to be
revisited soon to try to find out exactly what was going on. Nolan’s
story is so complex. There are dreams and then dreams within dreams
several times over. Sometimes, Cobb’s subconscious takes over another
person’s dream, and the vision of Mal dominates it and attempts to crash
the dream sequence. The rules in the dreams are some of the detractors,
though. If one gets hurt in a dream, the pain is real. If that person
dies, however, then they wake up. That is if they are not highly
sedated, in which case one will be cast into a limbo state (mentioned
earlier), which will hold them for an indefinite amount of time. This is
where Cobb and Mal were stuck for some 50 years in a city that their
imaginations created through memories. Also, five minutes in reality is
like an hour in a dream, 10 hours within the next dream, and that number
keeps multiplying as the levels go on. The term “inception” refers to an
art of implanting an idea into someone else’s mind, which is viewed as
impossible by most. I am sure that this all makes sense in Nolan’s mind,
but for someone just thrown right into the middle of the action, it
takes a while for it to all condense into rationality. Luckily, Ariadne
asks all the right questions, like the graduate student she is, which
helps put everything we don’t understand into perspective.
The cast in the film is one of the main appeals.
Leonardo DiCaprio is superb in his lead role, having a lot of the same
quirks as Teddy Daniels in the early 2010 movie
Shutter Island. Marion
Cotillard is good, and the main extractor of emotion. Joseph
Gordon-Levitt is great as usual. Ken Watanabe is always good to see. Tom
Hardy and Ellen Page steal most of the movie, which are basically the
only two who I did not expect that from. Cillian Murphy is fine.
Oscar-winner Michael Caine, Tom Berenger, and Pete Postlethwaite make
brief appearances. The cast is what keeps the film clicking. Their
conviction to telling Nolan’s dream keeps us all interested throughout.
Now, this film definitely has its flaws. The first
half hour or so seems completely pointless to the rest of the movie. We
are thrown into some huge, loud, messy action scene that is supposed to
be like how we are all dropped into a dream mid-swing and expected to
catch on right away to what is going on. The scene was an audition of
sorts for Saito to test Cobb and his crew to see if they were worthy of
taking on his task. It was an interesting idea, but this particular
dream was a mess. This type of issue is spread throughout the film.
There are way too many action scenes and gunshots. The sound editing is
great, much like it was in
The
Dark Knight, but it is just too loud and too persistent. The score
is a huge, booming score, which works for most of the film, except when
the quieter scenes needed something more touching. The rest of the film
technically and artistically is top notch. The cinematography and art
direction are astounding. The visuals are mind-blowing; particularly the
Matrix-esque hallway scene
where Arthur is being thrown around by the dreamer’s subconscious and
the entire dream world is being rotated on its axis.
Now, when this film is at its most coherent and
intelligent, it is as engaging as any movie I have seen this year. When
it is indulgent and confusing, the audience feels detached. This may be
because we still have almost no idea who these characters are and what
drives them, with the exception of Cobb. It is the ideas and dreams that
we get caught up in, so when we are lost, there is nothing to hold us in
its grasp. This does not happen too often, however, seeing how most of
it is completely compelling and at the very least intriguing.
Trying to piece this film together is like
Muholland Dr. in a way. It is
possible to unlock all the mysteries and payoffs, but it requires more
than one viewing. It is not as incoherent as
Inland Empire, but its
ambition and imagination rivals it.
The Matrix is a great
comparison. We are basically just dropped fully into someone else’s
dream and asked to try to find our way out. It is an amazing trip that
should be taken. Even though I cannot yet hail this as a masterpiece, I
can say that it is a somewhat vital viewing for anyone who is a fan of
these kinds of fractured films. With time, this could be among the best
films to come out in 2010. As for right now, it is just a trippy
big-budget blockbuster with a brain, which is all you can really ask of
a film like this. See it, and get lost for a while.
Rating:
|
New
Reviews |
Podcast Featured Review |
Podcast Featured Review |
Podcast Review - Zach |
Daly Notes Review |
Podcast Trivia Review - Zach |
Junior Jr. Watch
Podcast Review - Todd |
30th Anniversary
Podcast Oscar Review - Terry |
70th Anniversary
Daly Notes Review |
85th Anniversary
PODCAST DEEP DIVE |
Podcast Featured Review |
Podcast Review - Zach |
Podcast Review - Terry & Todd |
Podcast Review - Zach |
Junior Jr. Watch
Podcast Review - Todd |
10th Anniversary
Podcast Trivia Review - Terry |
Podcast Featured Review |
Podcast Review - Terry |
Podcast Trivia Review - Terry |
Junior Jr. Watch
Podcast Ribisi Review - Todd |
30th Anniversary
Podcast Oscar Review - Terry |
35th Anniversary
PODCAST DEEP DIVE |
Podcast Review - Zach |
Podcast Review - Todd |
Podcast Review - Terry |
Podcast Review - Todd |
Daly Notes Review |
5th Anniversary
Podcast SideShow Review |
10th Anniversary
Podcast Oscar Review - Terry |
Junior Jr. Watch
Podcast Review - Todd |
25th Anniversary
Daly Notes Review |
|
|